Jamie A. Thomas
  • About
  • Portfolio
  • Teaching
    • AfroLatinx Podcast
    • [ZOMBIES REIMAGINED]
  • Blog
  • Connect With Me

#languagestory blog

Video & perspectives on communication, intercultural learning & the impact of anthropological research.

This is How We Dismantle Structural Injustice and Normalized Bigotry

11/13/2016

0 Comments

 
by Jamie A. Thomas

Calling Out Our Roles in Perpetuating Normalized Injustice.

Walking in North PhillyMy students and I walking in North Philly with community activist and resident, .O.
Though many of us feel there's something deeply wrong about denying opportunities to girls and women, we are okay with demanding that women be judged by their femininity, hairstyles, and nail polish, or lack thereof. Even though we acknowledge that it takes the involvement of men, along with women, to stop sexism, how many of us readily understand that the burden of dismantling racist thinking and practice lies not primarily with marginalized groups?

Just two days after the presidential election result, and students in my regularly scheduled classes seemed lifeless and downtrodden, defeated and deflated. They had no questions, no thoughts for discussion, because their world had let them down. Somehow they had thought one vote would do it all, but I told them that it was never just about this election.

The dog whistles coming from Clinton's opponent (and his tacit supporters) were sounding the very racialization, sexist anxiety, and empowered prejudice that has festered in the U.S. since before its founding. It's a fundamentalist voice that hides behind economic anxiety and patriotism, while minoritizing, marginalizing, and dehumanizing many of the very people who seek to make this union more perfect. Hate speech and its accompanying mob violence, vigilante aggression, structural injustices, and covert, normalized language of biological inferiority have never been fully denounced in this country, and that is the true shame of this moment. 

Anyone clambering to declare "I am not a racist", has likely been unwilling to examine their participation in and benefit from structural inequity. For those of us who think we couldn't possibly be racist, sexist, ableist, class-ist, or otherwise, how do we treat people who (don't) look or sound like us? How much are our lowered expectations, dismissals, fears, and misunderstandings communicated in words like minority, wife, gay, ugly, unattractive, ghetto, poor, weak, foreign? What behaviors do we need to change, along with our language? How can we encourage each other to change?

My students looked so dejected, some close to tears. But this wasn't the time to tap out, I insisted. Now, more than ever, we needed to learn from this election, and from each other. We need to listen, reach out, and work together for social and structural change. And with that, I began preparing us for a visit to Serenity House, a community house and support center in North Philadelphia, where we would have a conversation with community partners about neighborhood activism and identity. 


Read More
0 Comments

Stop Saying This is The Apocalypse, People

11/9/2016

0 Comments

 
by Jamie A. Thomas

Don't Give Up Your Power.

Picture
I've been in touch this morning with a friend in the Netherlands.  Via WhatsApp, she asked me, "Are you scared for what's to come with Trump as president?" Another friend had posed a Trump win as an apocalyptic outcome. "The world will end...as we know it." Then, I was asked, "What will you do if he wins?"

My response was that I would do the same thing, no matter the election result. I would wake up the next morning, with the same plan I've had now for the last months, to take my students to North Philadelphia to local community center Serenity House, for a conversation and discussion with local residents about neighborhood identity and activism. We spent some time this semester in my sociolinguistics course analyzing the language of the presidential debates, and in the previous semester I was following election rhetoric with students in my course on Languages of Fear, Racism, and Zombies. If there's one thing I've learned about zombies, it's that things aren't always what they appear to be. 
​

Look, nobody respects women more than I do. *Insert wry laugh* But the last thing I'm planning to do is to throw in the towel, move to Canada (or elsewhere), and give up my social justice work. Hell, no. 

The moment we give way to calling this an apocalypse, we script this occurrence and phenomenon as inevitable and out of our control. We seek to absolve ourselves of our shared responsibility for turning this ship around. Now's the time for critical thinking, instead of conjurings about the end of the world, about deportations and mass executions.

I want to instead think about how to work to educate others, communicate with people I don't already know, and push for new elected representatives and legislation. Even in the movie The Day After Tomorrow, survivors had to begin improvising together, and the U.S. ultimately had to form a coalition with support from the Mexican government. There was always a next step, and it's no surprise that a library, a fountain of knowledge, is what saved the movie's main characters.


Read More
0 Comments

Terms Transgressed: Social Capital and Regimes of Civility at the Third Presidential Debate

11/2/2016

2 Comments

 
by William Marchese
Picture
During the Third Presidential Debate, a civil exchange about Putin swiftly “get[s] out of control” (line 18) as the audience reacts loudly to Trump’s talk. From the start, notions of political civility and egalitarianism are reinforced by interactional regimes. However, Trump’s transgression of civility and the audience’s response reveal struggles for power and the audience’s nebulous position within an ostensibly democratic space.
            
Notions of civility and egalitarianism are reinforced by interactional regimes. Under this political civility, debaters are expected to interact in ways deemed respectable. At the start of this moment, both Clinton and Trump act comfortably within such regimes. For example, in a response questioning Trump’s integrity, Clinton cites “seventeen of our intelligence agencies” (lines 14, 15) a stylistic choice that allows her to critique her opponent indirectly but strongly, with the seeming objectivity of independent institutions. Such restraint upholds her civility, and thus her place within the interactional regime. Similarly, Trump looks to notes atop his podium while speaking to appear deliberate and prepared in the exchange. Later, Clinton looks to Trump when finished talking, signaling that she is ready for his response. 

Again, this is a product of interactional regimes of civility, an expectation that one speaker talks audibly at a time. These moments of political civility are intertwined with notions of democratic egalitarianism, that the candidates converse on equal and fair terms. Indeed, this is how the debate was framed by Wallace’s opening monologue. While these terms are depicted as common sense, even natural, within the realm of discourse, they too are rooted in the regimes that reinforce them. As Fairclough (2014) notes, “the power to project one’s practices as universal and ‘common sense’ is a significant complement to […] power” (p. 64). It is the relationship between these regimes and the empowered speaker that define the discourse.


Read More
2 Comments

Campaign Combat: An Analysis of Donald Trump’s Communicative Style in the 2016 Presidential Debate

11/2/2016

2 Comments

 
by Amanda Izes
Picture
In moments of the Final Presidential Debate of 2016, Donald Trump and moderator Christopher Wallace continuously interrupt one another (CBS News, 2016).  Attempting to gain control over the discussion, Wallace employs a formal, defensive interruptive style. Differently, Trump invokes an informal, staccato-ed style using basic sentence structure repetitively, which is representative of his communicative behavior throughout the election.  Ultimately, the section ends with Trump turning attention to the faults of Hillary Clinton through a nonverbal pointing gesture.  This moment from the debate illustrates the manner in which Trump uses an offensive, truncated speaking style combined with pugilistic body language to gain control over the flow and topic of discussion.   

Trump's success brings up questions about the role of the quality of persuasive language particularly in a debate setting.  How necessary is traditional logic and argumentative skill in this debate? Here, verbal persuasion relies more on quantity than quality.  Repetition and salience capture our attention.  Perhaps, in a rapidly paced interactional context, quantity and tone drive communication more than quality.  Momentary success, in this debate, is defined as the ability to speak uninterrupted (Thomas, 2016).  Quantity, rather than quality, defines linguistic power and effectiveness in combative speech interactions.  ​


Read More
2 Comments

Donald Trump’s “Bad Hombres,” Language Appropriation, and the Reproduction of Whiteness by Linguistic Disassociation with Racial Others

11/2/2016

4 Comments

 
by Melanie Kleid
Picture
During the final presidential debate of 2016, Donald Trump’s response to the issue of immigration is charged by determination to secure America’s borders and disassociation with non-White Mexican people. Trump, with urgency, calls Clinton’s “amnesty” plan as a disaster.

​As he stresses the importance of building the southern border’s wall, words and phrases like “illegally,” “pouring and destroying their youth,” “poisoning the blood of their youth,” ultimately bring him to his potent conclusion: “...one of my first acts will be to get all of the drug lords, all of the bad ones- we have some bad, bad people in this country that have to go out…” and, finally closing in on these unnamed culprits, “we have some 
bad hombres here and we’re gonna get ‘em out” (my emphasis) (Bush & Desjardins, 2016). Interestingly, neither Wallace nor the audience audibly acknowledges Trump’s racially-charged uttering of “bad hombres.” 

Rather, Wallace thanks Trump and moves onto Clinton’s response. Clinton’s begins by referring to the people-at-hand as hard-working “undocumented people” a term widely recognized as less alienating to immigrants. Words like “citizen,” “children,” and “families” are scattered throughout her response; she, like her opponent, includes some violent language, repeating that she believes mass deportation would only work to rip families--and, later, our country--apart (Bush & Desjardins, 2016). Still, Clinton’s far less aggressive naming of undocumented people provides a crucial contrast not only in opinion, but also in linguistic behavior and affect.


Read More
4 Comments
<<Previous

    Main Author

    Jamie A. Thomas is a linguistic anthropologist and digital media producer. Her forthcoming book Zombies Speak Swahili is all about the undead, videogames, and viral Black language. She teaches at Santa Monica College.

    Archives

    January 2022
    September 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014

    Categories

    All
    Afterlife
    Art
    Beginnings
    Bilingualism
    Body
    Borderlands
    Cinema
    Collaboration
    Colloquial Speech
    Colonialism
    Communication
    Communicative Competence
    Context
    Creation
    Cuba
    Cultural Exchange
    Digital Humanities
    Diversity
    Election 2016
    Emoji
    Engaged Research
    Gender
    Gentrification
    Hashtag
    Ideology
    Idioms
    Inclusion
    In-N-Out
    Intercultural Learning
    Interpersonal Communication
    Intersectionality
    Linguistic Inequality
    Local
    Mexico
    Modality
    Museums
    Participation
    Philadelphia
    Project Goals
    Public Ethnography
    Public Health
    Public Memory
    Race
    Saturday Night Live
    Semiotics
    Sexuality
    Sign Language
    Spanish
    Speech Community
    Stereotypes
    Storytelling
    Study Abroad
    Video
    Women
    Zombies

    RSS Feed

​Thank you for visiting! More project photos and video: https://linktr.ee/jamieisjames​